Legal Opinion
Scher v. Kronman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 23, 1979PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bloom, J.
Plaintiff brought this action against Drs. Haroldson and Kronman, among others, including Columbia-Presbyterian Hospital, to recover for the wrongful death of her intestate based on claims of alleged malpractice. Plaintiff’s intestate died on February 24, 1973. The time in which this action was required to be commenced was two years after his death (EPTL 5-4.1).
On February 24, 1975, plaintiff served summonses with notice on the Sheriff of the City of New York, thus extending the time to effect service upon Haroldson, Kronman and others for a period of 60 days…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Trane Co. v. N. Robinson Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Butler v. UBS Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by16 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Yaniv v. TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Cuello v. PatelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Cuello v. PatelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gross v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.