Legal Opinion
American Cyanamid Co. v. Page
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided February 11, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-1594PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Motion of plaintiff’s counsel for attorneys’ fees demands the attention of, and has invited considerable research by, this court. On October 30, 1974, plaintiff exhibited in this court its Complaint seeking money recovery under a note apparently dated March 21, 1973, in the principal amount of $32,360.72. The note was a demand note and provided for interest from date at the rate of 8% per annum; defendant maker agreed to pay all costs of collection, including attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred by the holder because of the default of the maker. Defendant did not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Conway v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1926
- Richardson v. BreedingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
- Rinker v. LauerIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- George W. Dubreuil and Menas J. Caponas v. Robert B. StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Martin v. Traxler Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Global Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
- Ratliff v. The United States Department of EducationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021