Legal Opinion

Albrosky v. Iowa City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 21, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Johnson District Court. — Hour. S. II. Fairall, Judge. This is an action to recover damages which the plaintiff incurred by reason of a fall from an alleged defective and improperly constructed sidewalk.' There was a trial by jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Rothrock, J. —

1. tioefassi|na-°' errors: exactness returned. I. The assignment of errors is in these words : ‘ ‘ First. The court erred in overruling defendant’s objections to the introduction of certain testimony, shown in the abstract as objected to by defendant,.and in receiving objectionable testimony. Second. The *302court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to instruct the jury to return a verdict for defendant. Third. The court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the interrogatories asked by defendant. Fourth. The court erred in refusing to give to the jury instructions asked by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tomblin v. BallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Peck v. HendershottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Oschner v. SchunkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Reilly v. RinglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McMurray v. Capital Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Sneer v. StutzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Blocker v. SchoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Keokuk Stove Works v. D. Hammond & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. State v. Pacific Live Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API