Oschner v. Schunk
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Dubuque District Oourt. This is an action at law. The plaintiff held a judgment against Michael and Catherine Scliunk, and Catherine Wunderlich was garnished on execution. Her answer denies any indebtedness to the other defendants. Issue was taken upon her answer. There was a trial by jury — verdict and judgment for the garnishee. Plaintiff’ appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEotiirock, J.
i practice in court-1assign* mentof error. There is but one assignment of error. It is in these words: “ The court erred in overruling the motion for a new fa'i3-!-” This assignment is not sufficiently specific to meet the requirements of Sec. 3207 of ¿]ie Q0(je- jt is there provided that, “amongseveral points in a demurrer, or in a motion, or instructions, or rulings in an exception, it must designate which is relied on as an error, and the court will only regard errors which are *294assigned with the required exactness.” The motion for new trial in this case contained three points.
■ Appellees…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Waukon v. StrouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Albrosky v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Hoefer v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Wood v. WhittonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885