Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Minerals Co. v. Church & Mullins Corp.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1994No. 93-SC-587-TGPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

This action commenced in 1964 when Bethlehem Minerals Company, Bethlehem Mines Corporation, Beth-Elkhom Corporation, and Bethenergy Mines, Inc. (“Bethlehem”) filed an action for injunctive relief against John Johnson in the Pike Circuit Court. Bethlehem’s complaint charged that Johnson was hindering its survey efforts in preparation for deep mining of the mineral estate underlying certain property known as “Tract 42.” Johnson counterclaimed asserting ownership of the surface of Tract 42 as well as the minerals. Subsequent to the initiation of this thirty-year long…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fortney v. MahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  2. Church & Mullins Corp. v. Bethlehem Minerals Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schott v. Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Barnett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Furlong Development Co. v. Georgetown-Scott County Planning & Zoning CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. BustamonteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  4. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. JohnsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Shafizadeh v. ShafizadehCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API