Legal Opinion
Furlong Development Co. v. Georgetown-Scott County Planning & Zoning Commission
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 2016No. 2014-SC-000594-DGPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
JUSTICE CUNNINGHAM
Developer, Furlong Development Company and its owner, Gordon Stacy, (collectively referred to as “Developer”), owned a 26-acre tract of real estate in Georgetown, Kentucky. Developer intended to develop the property into 90 single-family residential lots known as “The Enclave.” Developer secured financing through United Bank & Trust Company, (hereinafter “the Bank”). The Bank provided financing in excess of 4 million dollars. Gordon Stacy, acting individually and in his capacity as Developer’s owner, guaranteed the loans by executing a promissory note…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Blankenship v. CollierKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Coomer v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Jones v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2009
- Hazard Coal Corp. v. KnightKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Superior Steel, Inc. v. Ascent at Roebling's Bridge, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Carter v. Paschall Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Agtech Scientific, LLC v. Blue Circle Development, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Chicken Shack Potsdam, LLC. v. KFC US, LLC.District Court, N.D. New York · 2025
- Crump v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.