Legal Opinion
Seven D. Enterprises, Ltd. v. Fonzi
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 7, 1977No. Civ. A. 7-70251PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KEITH, Chief Judge.
The defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Briefs were filed in support of and in opposition to this motion, and the matter came on for a hearing on April 25, 1977. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court denied defendants’ motion. Subsequent to the hearing, it came to the court’s attention that it had not had before it an affidavit prepared by the defendant Angelo Fonzi for the court’s consideration in connection with the motion for summary…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vera Croley, Etc. v. Matson Navigation Company, David E. Bouler v. Matson Navigation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Frank D. Felix D/B/A Club Zeus v. Coleman A. Young, Mayor, City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Bailey v. Meister Brau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- Chipley v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. SpurneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Dzierwa v. Michigan Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kelly v. Drake Beam Morin, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Hennum v. City of MedinaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Blair v. BoulgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.