Legal Opinion
Hines v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1993No. D019674PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FROEHLICH, J.
In our recent opinion in Sandeffer v. Superior Court (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 672 [22 Cal.Rptr.2d 261] we had occasion to construe certain aspects of Penal Code 1 section 1054.3, the new criminal discovery statute resulting from the approval in 1990 of Proposition 115. The trial court in that case had ordered the defense to produce certain documents pertaining to a defense expert witness, including not only the witness’s reports but also his “notes.” While striking the order on the ground of prematurity (the decision to call the expert as a witness had not as yet been made)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sarah Weeden v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Thompson v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Woods v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Roland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.