Legal Opinion
Roland v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 2004No. C047007PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTLAND, P. J.
Taneka Roland, the defendant in a criminal prosecution, seeks writ relief to compel the trial court to vacate its order directing her attorney to provide the prosecution with reports of relevant unrecorded oral statements provided to the defense by persons, other than Roland, whom her attorney intends to call as witnesses at trial. We issued an alternative writ and stayed further proceedings in the trial court pending our resolution of the discovery dispute.
This proceeding requires us to interpret section 1054.3 of the Penal Code, which governs the discovery obligations…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Rubio v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. E.A. (In re E.A.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.