Jackson v. Amador
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HICKMAN, Chief Justice.
Appellee, Mike Amador, instituted this suit against J. L. Jackson, Charles Umsted, and William Levine for damages for personal injuries. Umsted operated a general merchandise store in a building leased from Jackson. While walking down the aisle of said store, and as a customer thereof, appellee stuck several large splinters in his foot, which resulted in his sustaining substantial injuries. William Levine was joined as a party defendant under allegations that he was one of the owners of the business. It was developed upon the trial that he owned no interest therein, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MangumTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Perez v. RabaudTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Karotkin Furniture Co. v. DeckerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Ross v. HanerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Kamarath v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Tyler v. IngramTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Garza-Vale v. Kwiecien, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1990
- Johnson v. Murray Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.