Legal Opinion

In Re J.W. Westcott Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 31, 2002No. 01-CV-74359Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING CLAIMANTS’ “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT HULL” AND DENYING J.W. WESTCOTT COMPANY’S “MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST ROBERT HULL”

CLELAND, District Judge.

Pending before the court is Claimants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment Against Robert Hull,” filed on October 31, 2002. Petitioner J.W. Westcott Company also filed a “Motion for Summary Judgment Against Robert Hull,” on November 12, 2002, in which Petitioner expresses its desire to “[join] in Claimants’ motion for summary judgment against HULL.” (Pl.’s Mot. at 2.) 1 After reviewing the briefs, the court concludes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Halverson, Paul D. v. Slater, Rodney E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API