Legal Opinion

Bose v. Sullivan

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1930No. 6,609PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

The amended complaint in this action, which was filed in December, 1927, consists of two causes of action. The first sets forth that plaintiff sold and delivered to defendants by a written agreement a certain electric light and power outfit for which the defendants paid $1,100 cash, and made and delivered to plaintiff three promissory notes, two in the sum of $726.68, and one in the sum of $726.66, bearing date February 4, 1926, payable 70, 160 and 238 days, respectively, from date; that no payments have been made on the notes; that there is due to plaintiff and unpaid on the notes the sum of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hurley v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McGinn v. WilleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Kenison v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cook v. MacGinnissMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hix v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Silver's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Francisco v. FranciscoMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  3. J. M. Hamilton Co. v. BattsonMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Money v. DameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Adamczik v. McCauleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API