Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Pinkerton Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 16, 1999No. 01-99-00596-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIM TAFT, Justice.

Appellant, James P. Morrison, challenges a summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellees, Pinkerton, Inc., Individually and d/b/a Pinkerton Security and Investigation Services (Pinkerton) and Prime Bank, N.A. (Prime Bank) against his claim for disability discrimination under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA), tortious interference with business and contractual relations, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 1 We address whether some evidence was raised as to whether morbid obesity is a disability under the TCHRA and whether joint…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sherrod v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  5. Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  2. Davis v. City of GrapevineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Little v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  4. Thomann v. Lakes Regional MHMR Center, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  5. Lottinger v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API