Polk v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
The indictment contains two counts; the first charges that appellant did unlawfully and directly keep and exhibit for the purpose of gaming a policy game; the second count charges that he did unlawfully through his agents Will Johnson and Lon Geights keep and exhibit for the purpose of gaming a policy game, etc.
Motion was made to quash because the indictment charges no offense against the law: There is no such game known as a policy game, and because “policy” as it is known and has been judicially defined is not a game but is a lottery, and partakes of the true…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Beuchert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Kinney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WyeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Cagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944