Legal Opinion
Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co. v. Juckem
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 1925No. 24,534PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEES, O.
This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of defendants Edward and Emily Juekem for a new trial of an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on their homestead. The action was) commenced in January, 1923, by the Olson & Serley Sash & Door Company to enforce its lien on the property. The respondent, Appleton* who had also filed a lien claim, was joined as a party defendant. His lien statement was filed on December 19, 1922. It appears therefrom that the date of the last item of his claim is November 27,1922. The summons was served on the appellants, but they failed to appear or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Bauman v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Burns v. PhinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Sandberg v. PalmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Standard Home Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Terry J. Kolb v. Scherer Brothers Financial Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Kolb v. Scherer Bros. Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Miles Construction Co. v. KrumreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001