Legal Opinion
Federal Power Commission v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 15, 1954No. 28PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court 1
347 U.S. 239 (1954)
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION
v.
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
No. 28.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 15-16, 1953.
Decided March 15, 1954.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
Willard W. Gatchell argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Murray L. Schwartz, Paul A. Sweeney, Hubert H. Margolies, Herman Marcuse and Joseph B. Hobbs.
John W. Davis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Randall J. LeBoeuf, Jr., Lauman Martin,…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Burton; Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- First Iowa Hydro-Electric Cooperative v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- John Sturgeon v. Sue MasicaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017