Legal Opinion
Dampskibsaktieselskabet Den Norske Afrika Og Australieline v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 28, 1969No. Nos. 300 and 308PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEKS, District Judge.
The captioned actions arise out of the same casualty and were consolidated for trial and all other purposes. The Court has jurisdiction over both actions under 28 U.S.C. § 1333.
In Number 300 the partnership Wilh. Wilhelmsen, composed of Dampskibsaktieselskabet Den Norske Afrika og Australieline, Wilhelmsens Dampskibsaktieselskab A/S Tonsberg, A/S Tankfart I, A/S Tankfart IV, A/S Tankfaft V, and A/S Tankfart VI (Wilhelmsen), owner of M/S TROJA and A/S Kristian Jebsens Rederi (Jebsens), time charterer of TROJA, brought action against Intalco Aluminum Corporation (Intalco),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Mosher v. ConwayArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Fosbre v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Federal Commerce & Navigation Co. v. the M/V MarathonianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Dampskibsaktieselskabet v. Bellingham Stevedoring Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Dampskibsaktieselskabet, Etc. v. Bellingham Stevedoring Company, and Intalco Aluminum Corporation, American Metal Climax, Inc. v. Bellingham Stevedoring Company, and Intalco Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972