Andrews v. . the Artisans' Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] If the facts respecting the discount of Bensen's note were such as the defendant offered to prove them, the credit which the plaintiff obtained on the defendant's books, being the result of his fraud, was unavailing, either as a contract for the payment of the sum which was in form credited, or as evidence of money of the plaintiff in the defendant's hands. The contract to pay the amount to the plaintiff upon his checks in the usual course of banking business,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Byxbie v. . WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Willson v. ForeeNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Utica Bank v. Van GiesonNew York Supreme Court · 1821
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kittredge v. GrannisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Wickham v. WeilNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
- Flatow v. Jefferson BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Abmour v. Sound Shore Front Improvement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
- Armour v. Sound Shore Front Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.