Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Lumber Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 11, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff sued for $150. He alleged that on 5 February, 1904, the defendant employed him for four months at $75 per month to inspect and buy lumber, and his service began on that day. The defendant paid the wages for the first month and then discharged the plaintiff without cause, its superintendent stating that they did not intend to buy any more lumber. The plaintiff tried to get other employment, but failed, and earned but a few dollars during the last three months. He sued for the second installment of his wages and recovered judgment 6 May, before a magistrate, for $75. The summons…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Costigan v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail-RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Strauss v. MeertiefSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Machine Co. v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Johnson v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Behr v. BehrCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Robinson v. . McAlhaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. First National Pictures Distributing Corp. v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Marrison v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API