Legal Opinion

Black v. Knight

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1917No. S. F. No. 7212PublishedCited by 21 opinions

• APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Jas. M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for damages for the alleged unlawful eviction of plaintiff by his landlord from premises held and occupied by him as a tenant under a lease. Judgment was given for the sum of $10,449, and the appeal is from such judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. All but $586 of the amount awarded was on account of the value of the unexpired term of the lease (fixed at $11,544), such $586 being for expense and damage incurred in defending the unlawful detainer action.

The only alleged eviction found was the prosecution by the landlord to judgment in the superior…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mack v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Porter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Jennings v. BondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Munoz v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Roseneau Foods, Inc. v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API