Legal Opinion

Cleveland Heater Co. v. Sawyer

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 10, 1952No. Civ. No. 1345-52Published

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff applied for a patent in the United States Patent Office. The Patent Office instituted an interference proceeding (No. 84,270) between plaintiff and the defendant, McGraw Electric Company, who claimed priority to the same invention. There was a final ruling awarding priority of invention of the subject matter to the defendant, Electric Company, and thereupon plaintiff brought this action under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, against the above named defendant, the Commissioner of Patents and the Secretary of Commerce. Secretary and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speed Products. Co., Inc. v. Tinnerman Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. Coe v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Tomlinson of High Point v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  4. Drackett Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  5. Eno v. CoeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API