In re Henningsen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as abové). It was said at bar that this case had been brought up both by appeal and petition to revise. No such petition has been filed, and, though in somewhat unusual form, we hold the document which brought the case here to be a notice of appeal. Undoubtedly questions of this kind have been brought to this court by petition to revise, neither party objecting. In re Noethen, 201 Fed. 97, 119 C. C. A. 435. But appellee’s effort was to get something on which he asserted a lien, or as to which he prayed a priority, ’which something was already in the actual possession…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klein v. . MaravelasNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Swift Co. v. . TempelosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Toxaway Hotel Co. v. Smathers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Gibbons v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- In re ZeisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American S. S. Co. v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1930
- In re Rosom Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- In re SarawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In re HandersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
- In re United Traveling Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.