Legal Opinion

In re United Traveling Goods Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1924No. 155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The bankrupt was engaged in the manufacture and sale of articles sufficiently indicated by its name. It gave a chattel mortgage, to which was appended a schedule of the chattels covered by the instrument of hypothecation. This schedule enumerates specifically certain machines and tools, and concludes with the following words:

“All shaftings, transmitters, pulleys, belting, benches, gas stove, plumbing, shelves, office fixtures, and all other chattels and utensils, as well as ‘everything else m said place contained and thereto belonging, and located in the premises No. 586 Grand street in°the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HenningsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re SarawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. In re Novelty Belts Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  3. In re Rosom Utilities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API