Legal Opinion
In re United Traveling Goods Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 7, 1924No. 155PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The bankrupt was engaged in the manufacture and sale of articles sufficiently indicated by its name. It gave a chattel mortgage, to which was appended a schedule of the chattels covered by the instrument of hypothecation. This schedule enumerates specifically certain machines and tools, and concludes with the following words:
“All shaftings, transmitters, pulleys, belting, benches, gas stove, plumbing, shelves, office fixtures, and all other chattels and utensils, as well as ‘everything else m said place contained and thereto belonging, and located in the premises No. 586 Grand street in°the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re HenningsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re SarawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In re Novelty Belts Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- In re Rosom Utilities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938