Legal Opinion

Gerdom v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1981No. 79-3215PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs contend that Continental Airlines’ weight requirements for its flight attendants violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1976), because they discriminate on the basis of sex. They advance both adverse impact and disparate treatment arguments in support of their claim. We affirm the district court’s finding that the plaintiffs’ adverse impact claim is without merit. But we remand for consideration of the disparate treatment claim.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Until 1973, Continental required that its flight hostesses,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  5. Celio DIAZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gerdom v. Continental Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. In re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  3. Craft v. Vanderbilt UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
  4. Ex Parte Russell Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. 30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 593, 31 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1324, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,173, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,622 Lynda Leboeuf Costa v. John A. MarkeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API