Legal Opinion

Byers v. . Byers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 25, 1942PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

In defining the cause for divorce created by it, chapter 100, Public Laws of 1937, under which this action is brought, reads as follows:

“Section 1. Marriages may be dissolved and the parties thereto divorced from the bonds of matrimony on the application of either party, if and when the husband and wife have lived separate and apart for two years, and the plaintiff in the suit for divorce has resided in the State for a period of one year.”

The question posed for our consideration is whether a divorce a vinculo can be had under this law upon the ground that the parties “have lived separate and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sitterson v. . SittersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Brown v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Oliver v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Woodruff v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Hyder v. . HyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Young v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Taylor v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API