Legal Opinion

G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 2005No. 9908-08606; A111077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Petitioners appeal a judgment affirming an order of the Oregon Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) that, in turn, clarified an earlier EQC order granting the United States Army (Army) a hazardous waste permit for the construction and operation of an incineration facility to destroy chemical weapons stored at the Umatilla Chemical Depot. Petitioners complain that the trial court erred because it did not permit them to make an adequate record and because, in any event, the clarifying order is not supported by substantial evidence. The EQC responds that the appeal should be dismissed because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First Commerce of America, Inc. v. Nimbus Center AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hood River County v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Ososke v. Driver and Motor Vehicle ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hayes Oyster Co. v. DEQCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Ebasco Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Gasp v. EqcCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API