Legal Opinion
Dayton-Wright Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 20, 1928No. F-49PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge
On May 4, 1921, the Engineering Division of the Air Sendee, U. S. Army, at Dayton, Ohio, issued a circular soliciting the submission of designs and sealed proposals for furnishing the division, among other type,s, a special type of single-seater pursuit airplane, a new type of airplane to be used for the defense of airdromes or home stations, and designated as an “Alert airplane.” The possibility of attaining a plane to meet the situation was indeterminative and the construction of one experimental. Each bidder was expressly required to submit its own design, accompanied by a detailed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Van Rosen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Steel Products Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- Whitlock Coil Pipe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.