Legal Opinion

Steel Products Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 9, 1931No. H-27PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff sues to recover damages in the sum of $31,520.28, growing out of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant for the reconditioning of five hundred Liberty engines.

Article I of the contract provides:

“ The contractor hereby agrees to recondition five hundred (500) New Liberty engines from storage, in accordance with Air Service Specifications No. 28303-A, the Government to provide the contractor with five hundred (500) Liberty engines, f. o. b. Little Rock Air Intermediate Depot, Little Eock, Ark., and the contractor to recondition the same in accordance with terms and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Warren Bros. Roads Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  4. RM Hollingshead Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation and Polytron Company, by and Through Walsh Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API