Legal Opinion
Garlasco v. Stuart
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 17, 2009No. 3:07CV00318 (DJS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
DOMINIC J. SQUATRITO, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Paul Garlasco (“the Plaintiff’) brings this action against the defendants, William T. Stuart (“Stuart”) and the Town of Bridgewater (“the Town”) (collectively, “the Defendants”), alleging that the Defendants violated his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Pursuant to Rules 12 and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Defendants have filed their “Motion to Dismiss 1 and for Summary Judgment.” 2 (Dkt. #20.) The Plaintiff has filed two…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Giuliani v. Springfield TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- TZ Manor, LLC v. DainesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011