Lundquist v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal reported in 134 Minn. 279, 158 N. W. 426, 159 N. W. 569, there was a retrial of the accounting before Daly, J., who made further findings, ordered judgment in favor of plaintiff for $14,273.54, and dismissed the action as to Caroline Peterson. Plaintiff’s motion for amended findings was denied. Defendants’ motion for amended findings was denied. Prom an order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appealed.
1Per curiam
In our decision on the former appeal in this case, reported in 134 Minn. 279, 158 N. W. 426, 159 N. W. 569, we held that the evidence sustained the findings of the trial court that defendants made fraudulent representations to the plaintiff at the time he transferred to them his interest in the property of a copartnership composed of plaintiff and defendants; that the evidence sustained a finding that plaintiff believed and relied upon such representations and was induced by them to make the transfer; that the action was not barred by the statute of limitation, and that the trial court did…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lundquist v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916