Legal Opinion
Bechtel Petroleum, Inc. v. Webster
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 18, 1985No. C-82-6664 WHOPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
This decision holding that this Court will not abstain from considering vel non to exercise its jurisdiction to protect the decree entered in a companion case involving the same parties and the same issues merely adds more strands to the arcane web of federal and state litigation involving charges by governmental agencies and one thousand former employees of Bechtel Petroleum Co. (“Bechtel”) that Bechtel, in the course of its construction of the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline Project, violated both state and federal wage and hour laws, namely, the Alaska…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor v. A-One Medical Services, Inc. Alternative Rehabilitation Home Healthcare, Inc. Lorraine Black and Hanahn KormanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Michael A. Dunn v. James B. Carey, Delaware County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Victa v. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Rowe v. Grapevine Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- Bechtel Petroleum, Inc. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.