State v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Chief Justice.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for two counts of first-degree murder and two counts of felony murder in the killings of Elaine Furey and Alfred Stafki. Three issues are presented on this direct appeal: (1) Whether defendant was so mentally ill or deficient at the time of committing the murders that he did not know the nature of his act or that it was wrong; (2) whether the trial court erred in sentencing defendant to two consecutive life terms; and (3) whether the trial court erred when it formally adjudicated defendant guilty of all four counts of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HennumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Bangert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. Sanchez-DiazSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.