Diane Patricia Horen v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Judge.
Timothy Horen and Diane Horen were convicted of possession of wild bird feathers and parts in violation of Code § 29!-521(A)(10). 1 The dispositive question is whether the application of Code § 29!-521(A)(10) to prohibit the possession of lawfully obtained owl feathers for the practice of the Horens’ Native American religion violates their constitutional right to the free exercise of religion.
We find that Code § 29!-521(A)(10) is not a religiously neutral statute, that it substantially burdens the free exercise of the Horens’ religion, and that the Commonwealth failed to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. HardmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Fulton v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Mitchell County v. Matthew Hoover ZimmermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- United States v. Raymond S. Hardman, in the Matter of Joseluis Saenz, Claimant-Appellee v. Department of the Interior, United States of America v. Samuel Ray Wilgus, Jr., Christian Legal Society, the New Mexico Civil Liberties Foundation, the Commission on Social Action of Reformed Judaism, Hopi Tribe, and Jicarilla Apache Nation, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Fulton v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.