Legal Opinion

Ameigh v. Baycliffs Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1998No. 1996-1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 247.] AMEIGH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BAYCLIFFS CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Ameigh v. Baycliffs Corp.,

1998-Ohio-467.] Civil procedure—Where judgment of a court is not dispositive on issues that a party later seeks to litigate, res judicata is not applicable, even if the prior court decision has discussed the issues that are the subject of the current litigation. (No. 96-1209—Submitted October 21, 1997—Decided February 6, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ottawa County, No. OT-95-049.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Grava v. Parkman Twp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Morrison v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Krahn v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Schwartz, Unpublished Decision (6-24-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Pengal v. Mentor-On-The-Lake, Unpublished Decision (9-23-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API