Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1999No. 990373PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Per curiam

Holding that the jury was not properly instructed on the elements of the plaintiffs’ cause of action, the court of appeals remanded this case for a new trial in the interest of justice under Rule 43.3(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 1 Based on what we think is the issue that should be remanded, we deny the petitions for review.

Wilton and Wilford Wilson, brothers, drowned in a stretch of the Ped-ernales River that flooded while they were fishing. The accident occurred where the river borders on Pedernales Falls State Park, and the Wilsons’ beneficiaries sued the owner of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Denton v. Van PageTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Colonial Savings Ass'n v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Lefmark Management Co. v. OldTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. County of Cameron v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Waco v. KirwanTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. United Scaffolding, Inc. v. James LevineTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Nauslar v. Coors Brewing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API