Legal Opinion

Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 1, 1994No. C14-91-00795-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED MAJORITY OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

DRAUGHN, Justice.

In this Jones Act, general maritime case, the trial court after a jury verdict entered judgment for personal injury damages to Richard Ellis. Appellant, Maritime Overseas Corporation, in fifteen points of error, raises legal and evidentiary challenges to the actual and punitive damages awarded, and to the exclusion of certain evidence. We affirm the judgment in part and reverse and render in part.

The central issue in this case is one of first impression because it requires us to examine the issues of causation and…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maritime Overseas Corp. v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Blankenship v. Mirick, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Waltrip v. Bilbon Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  5. US Sugar Corp. v. HensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API