Legal Opinion

Whitcomb v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 11, 1913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

These two actions were tried and have been argued together. They are brought to recover for injuries caused by and damages arising out of a collision of trains on the defendant’s *441road at Sharon Heights, on August 24, 1898. Both the plaintiff and his wife, Virginia H. Whitcomb, were injured, and it is claimed by the plaintiff tffat a sum of money belonging to him was lost at the time of the collision from a handbag carried by his wife.

The first action is for the plaintiff’s personal injuries and for the money in the handbag belonging to him. The second action is for loss of the services and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Feneff v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Bolger v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Dunlap v. International Steamboat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Hunt v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Levins v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Hinnant v. Tidewater Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Gearing v. BerksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Helmstetler v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Rodgers v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API