Legal Opinion

Thomason v. Britian

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1921No. File No. 4540PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Circuit Court, Fall 'River County. Hon. Luvi McGu®, Judge. Action by George Thomason, against A. R. Britian and others, to recover on a promissory note; A. R. Britian being treated on appeal as sole defendant. From a judgment .for Plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, Plaintiff appeals-

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

Action to recover on a promissory note given plaintiff by the defendants. This action may be treated as though A. R. Britian was the sole defendant, ánd we so treat it. Defendant claimed that plaintiff was employed by him as a real estate agent to act in his behalf in making a sale or exchange of a tract of land belonging to him in Missouri; that plaintiff found one Barham who was willing to exchange, for defendant’s land, two small tracts of land, one situate in Missouri and the other in Kansas; that a contract for such exchange was entered into between Barham and defendant, and deeds…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baird v. GlecklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Needham v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API