Legal Opinion

Burche v. Neal

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1929No. C. C. 423PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge :

This ease is here on certification from Wood County. In 1872 S. Q. A. Burche conveyed to H. H. Moss, trustee, for Fannie S. Burche, wife of grantor, two lots and a dwelling located in Parkersburg. The habendum clause of the deed is as follows:

‘1 To have and to hold the said premises with the appurtenances unto the said H. H. Moss, trustee, for the sole use and benefit of the said Fannie S. Burche; but whereas, should the said Fannie S. Burche die and leave no living issue by her present husband, then the above described property shall revert and be vested in the said S. Q. A.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stout v. CliffordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Suter v. SuterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StarbuckWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Young v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Paul v. . WilloughbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Tavenner v. BaughmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API