Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews Construction v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews, seek review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board quashing notice of hearing under section 10(k) of the NLRA (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(k). We deny the petition for review.
I
Shurtleff & Andrews Constructors (“Shurtleff”) and Foley-Wismer & Becker (“Foley-Wismer”) (together, “the Companies”) each employed members of the Teamsters, Operating Engineers, and other unions. The Companies both utilize large cranes to pull 40-foot flatbed trailers which are loaded with construction material from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Uscp-Wesco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Food and Commercial Workers Union, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pepsi-Cola Co. v. Rhode Island Carpenters District CouncilDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
- Recon Refractory & Construction Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews Construction v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Recon Refractory & Construction Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005