Legal Opinion

Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews Construction v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1982No. 80-7272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

Petitioners, Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews, seek review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board quashing notice of hearing under section 10(k) of the NLRA (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(k). We deny the petition for review.

I

Shurtleff & Andrews Constructors (“Shurtleff”) and Foley-Wismer & Becker (“Foley-Wismer”) (together, “the Companies”) each employed members of the Teamsters, Operating Engineers, and other unions. The Companies both utilize large cranes to pull 40-foot flatbed trailers which are loaded with construction material from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Uscp-Wesco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, United Food and Commercial Workers Union, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Pepsi-Cola Co. v. Rhode Island Carpenters District CouncilDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1997
  3. Recon Refractory & Construction Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews Construction v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Recon Refractory & Construction Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API