Legal Opinion

Foley-Wismer & Becker and Shurtleff & Andrews Construction v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1982No. 80-7272Published

1Opinion of the Court

695 F.2d 424

112 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2417, 96 Lab.Cas. P 13,959

FOLEY-WISMER & BECKER and Shurtleff & Andrews Construction,

Petitioners,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 80-7272.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 17, 1981.

Decided Dec. 28, 1982.

Wesley M. Wilson, Yakima, Wash., for petitioners.

Ruah Donnelly Lahey, Washington, D.C., for respondent; Margery E. Lieber, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief.

Petition for Review from the National Labor Relations Board.

Before SKOPIL and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and KENYON,* District Judge.

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

1

P…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Radio & Television Broadcast Engineers Union, Local 1212Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Plasterers' Local Union No. 79Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API