Tuttle v. Pollock
North Dakota Supreme Court
Original application by Ole B. Tuttle for mandamus to be directed to Charles A. Pollock, Judge of the Third Judicial District.
1ConcurrenceEllsworth, J.
I concur in the result and in the opinion generally, except upon the holding that mandamus is the only proper remedy to compel a trial court to settle a statement of the case when it wrongfully refuses so to do. On this point I am of the opinion that mandamus, while proper, is not under our statutes the exclusive, remedy.
Note — Supreme Court may compel a district judge to settle a statement of the case according to law. Kaeppler v. Pollock, 8 N. D. 59. Supreme Court can settle a statement of the case when the trial court refuses to “in accordance with facts.” Taylor v. Miller, 10 N. D. 361,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kaeppler v. PollockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Taylor v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901