Legal Opinion

Kaeppler v. Pollock

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Original application of Carl A. Kaeppler for mandamus directed to Charles A. Pollock, as judge of the Third Judicial District.

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, C. J.

This was an original application to this Court by Carl A. Kaeppler for a writ of mandamus directed to Hon. Charles A. Pollock, Judge of the Third District. The application discloses the following facts: Kaeppler brought an action in the District Court of Cass County against the Red River Valley National Bank. The case came on regularly for trial before Judge Pollock and a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. In due time, plaintiff served notice of his intention to move for a new trial, on the ground of errors of law occurring at the trial in the admission of evidence and in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Frank v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wigal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Jackson v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Jackson v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Dyer v. The "Ivanhoe"District Court, D. Hawaii · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API