Butler v. Lashley
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. Counsel for the plaintiffs in error, in their oral argument before this court on the call of the case, having conceded that the attack made upon the will for lack of testamentary capacity was not supported by the evidence, that question will not be considered.
2. Under the evidence, the verdict of the jury, finding against the caveators' contention that the testator executed the will in question under fraud, duress, and undue influence, was demanded.
3. Under the foregoing ruling, a consideration of the special assignments of error becomes unnecessary.
No. 14767. FEBRUARY 9, 1944. REHEARING…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- DeNieff v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Bohler v. HicksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Hill v. DealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Thompson v. DavitteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scurry v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Crews v. CrewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Edwards v. ShumateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Dobbs v. BurnetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982