Hill v. Deal
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The three subscribing witnesses to the instrument offered for probate were sworn, and testified to its due execution by the testatrix as her will, that the same was freely and voluntarily executed, and in effect that the alleged testatrix was of sound and disposing mind and memory. When the propounders showed these three facts, they made out a prima facie case for the will; and unless other testimony was brought forward which made an issue as to one of these three essentials, or unless the caveators produced evidence tending to show that the alleged will was the *45result of undue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. BuffingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Brown v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Cook v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Burroughs v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Morgan v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Whitfield v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Pantone v. PantoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Spivey v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Orr v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.