Legal Opinion

In Re David J. McCoy

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 26, 1936No. File #49709Published

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The respondent is charged with unprofessional conduct in seven counts. There are two fourth counts. Both were withdrawn during the trial. The second, third and fifth counts had justification in the evidence but, under the circumstances disclosed, proved to be so much less serious than the first and sixth that most of the evidence was confined to the latter and they only are here considered.

In view of the fact that no evidence was offered by the respondent and that his attorney admitted in argument the charges in these two counts, no extended discussion of them is required. The gist of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fairfield County Bar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  2. In re GraffiusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Grievance Committee of the Hartford County Bar v. BroderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. In re HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Samuel W. Salus's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API