Legal Opinion
Miller v. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 20, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
A verdict recovered by the plaintiff under his original declaration was set aside on rule to show cause. Miller v. West Jersey and Seashore Railroad Co., 42 Vroom 363. The material facts are stated in the opinion of tiie Supreme Court.
The original declaration had counted upon the negligence of defendant’s servants. Before the retrial of the case the plaintiff amended his declaration by the addition of a count setting up the negligence of an agent of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and charging that it was “the duty of the defendant and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Exton v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Frelinghuysen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- West Jersey & S. R. v. CochranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
- Meyonberg v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Overbeck v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936