Legal Opinion

California Improvement Co. v. Moran

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1900No. S.F. No. 1245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action to foreclose a street assessment lien. Defendant had judgment^ from which and from an order deny-. ing its motion for a new trial plaintiff appeals.

The principal question involved relates to the publication of the notice awarding the contract for street work. The court found as facts that the city council of the city of Oakland directed its clerk to publish the notice of the award in the “Oakland Tribune,” and did not direct the notice to be published in the “Oakland Morning Times”; that the notice was-published in the “Times” and was not published in the “Tribune.”…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grimm v. O'ConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Welles v. BattelleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  3. Perine v. ForbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Manning v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Shipman v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Haggart v. AltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Owen v. SchottenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API