Legal Opinion

Woerter v. David

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 10, 1941No. Gen. No. 41,720PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

August 20,1940, plaintiff’s predecessor caused judgment by confession to be entered against Abraham David and Fannie David for $776.30. The basis of the action was a promissory note executed by the two defendants May 12, 1931, for $430, payable six months after date to the Humboldt State Bank at “2722 North Avenue, Chicago,” with interest at 7% per annum after maturity. The judgment included the face of the note, $430, interest, $246.30 and $100 attorney’s fees. Execution issued on the judgment and was served on the two defendants by the bailiff of the Municipal court August 29, 1940. Seven…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. VanNorman v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gomez v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Ascencio v. RamirezDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1984
  3. U.S. Bank Trust v. AtchleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. State v. DuncanConnecticut Superior Court · 1981
  5. Molner v. SkrentnyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API