Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dobson v. Honeycutt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 21, 1986No. 8529SC743Published

1Concurrence

Judge Parker

concurring in result.

I concur in the result, but I would overrule plaintiffs’ first assignment of error regarding the peremptory instruction for a different reason. Under the authority of Electro Lift, Inc. v. Miller Equipment Company, 270 N.C. 433, 154 S.E. 2d 465 (1967), a trial judge in giving a peremptory instruction in his charge to the jury must give the jury the opportunity for either an affirmative or negative response, and I agree with the majority that the proper form for the instruction is as set forth in the civil pattern jury instructions. However, in my view…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. H. C. Jones Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Electro Lift, Inc. v. Miller Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API